walkitout (walkitout) wrote,
walkitout
walkitout

Is someone concerned Bloomberg might be thinking of running in 2016?

Given Bloomberg's history, there would be four conceivable slots for him (either party, either position).

I kinda like a lot of what Bloomberg has done, and some of the most obviously Not So Great things (blowing past term limits when he said he wouldn't) seemed a little 'meh'. This, however, is a compelling argument against voting for him:

http://gawker.com/5979679/id-do-her-a-brief-history-of-michael-bloombergs-public-sexism

Sort of an interesting piece to put out there; dunno what prompted it, but it sure looks like maneuvering to shut down a possible run.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments