walkitout (walkitout) wrote,
walkitout
walkitout

Making another run at the divorces

I'm about halfway through _Putting Asunder_, and it's due at the library tomorrow and already has a hold request from someone else so I cannot renew it. I've ordered a used copy (about $70 for an ex-lib copy, which is why I originally got it from the library but it is just too long and too slow a read).

In the mean time, I thought I'd make a real effort to get the divorce records, which I think are all public record. Alas, for my grandmother, I only have the most general idea of when and where the divorces might have occurred.

Her first marriage was in Manitoba, Canada. At the time, it seems a divorce could be gotten through the provincial courts or by Act of Parliament. I looked for the last name in the database for the statutory divorces and got nothing (which is mildly amazing). Then I tracked down where the boxes of court records went -- the Manitoba Archives -- found their researcher list, and sent e-mail questions out to a couple of the researchers to see if they want the job.

Her second marriage was very brief and in Spokane, so I sent an e-mail to the Spokane Superior Court clerk, mentioning the first divorce as well.

Her third marriage was longer, and in Whatcom County, so I sent an e-mail to the Whatcom County Superior Court clerk, mentioning all three divorces, but mostly the third.

I keep having to remind myself that there's a decent chance that none of these divorces exist. There was a lot of moving around, and _Putting Asunder_ makes utterly clear (in case that thing by Martin Luther slipped your mind) that moving and remarrying was a way to create the equivalent of a divorce.

Anyway. The other divorces I am more optimistic about. My great-grandfather was married four times, and the middle two predeceased him. I've got a very tight window for the first divorce, as the couple was still living together in the 1930 census, and he remarried in 1931. Even better, I have a Seattle Times newspaper listing the second divorced in the Granted column.

Washington State may actually provide the case files for me. Fingers crossed; I might learn something.

ETA: Altho I wonder what I'm going to do if I find out the Washington State dissolutions are actually annulments rather than divorces, due to the first marriage never being ended. That'd be something, right?
Tags: genealogy
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 1 comment