walkitout (walkitout) wrote,

selective reading of the constitution

My husband told me today he heard about a guy claiming that the Supreme Court held that child labor laws were unconstitutional. I heard the same clip that my husband saw -- the case the guy had zeroed in on was from 1918 and ignored a later case (in 1941, IIRC) which reversed that earlier decision.

Sample coverage over at Think Progress (I'm not saying they broke this -- I have no idea where R. saw it; I saw it on Countdown):


FWIW, this would be like ignoring Brown vs. the Board of Education and arguing that segregation is constitutional because of Plessy vs. Ferguson.

Or, saying it's _not_ okay to be gay, but it _is_ okay to eat shrimp.
  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.