walkitout (walkitout) wrote,
walkitout
walkitout

Maybe _now_ you are impressed?

R. sent me this link.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-21/amazon-com-is-said-to-exceed-kindle-sales-estimates-by-60-shares-advance.html

It reminds me a little of when that analyst was digging around in AT&T wireless filings and stumbled across some numbers that suggested the kindle was selling a lot back then.

I love kindles. I love Amazon. But in a rational world, we wouldn't be arguing about whether e-books and/or kindle e-books were an "impressive" portion of overall book sales. We'd be having a really serious discussion about how we feel about a probable effective monopoly on a par with what Wintel had with personal computers for a lot longer than they should have.

Maybe we feel like that's a good thing. There's an argument to be made for standardization. And there are a few people talking about it. Heck, maybe it wouldn't make any difference one way or another in the long run anyway.
Tags: e-book coverage
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments