walkitout (walkitout) wrote,
walkitout
walkitout

sentences that worry me

I finished Okrent, and it's the first book in a very long time that I was sad to finish. I could have read that book for weeks and been happy. Amazing stuff. A review will be forthcoming.

In the meantime, I'm already worried about _Dirt: the Erosion of Civilizations_, by Montgomery. Never mind the Wendell Berry epigraph. How about this sentence:

"Yet why would so many unrelated civilizations like the Greeks, Romans, and Mayans all last about a thousand years?"

That is about the worst "when did you stop beating your wife" question I've seen in a nominally academic book in a while (University of California Press). (1) Asserting that the Greek and Roman civilizations are "unrelated" is wacky. (2) Asserting that any of the three civilizations lasted "about a thousand years" is controversial (and multiplying that error by three does not help). And _even if_ those two problems (which are serious) didn't exist, I could think of dozens of alternative explanations (and so have plenty of better historians before me). No one should be allowed to do that to a poor English sentence. There's only so much one grammatical construct can take. Never mind the reader.

I already know the other soil/food/civilization book I have lying around waiting for me (_Empires of Food_) has deep, dark problems (altho I am _so_ looking forward to disemboweling it). Maybe it's the entire topic area? Soil erosion/conservation is a really important issue. It deserves better than this.
Tags: not-a-book-review
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments