Arizona was one of the few (possibly only) property rights propositions to survive the 2006 slaughter. Here's a little update on how that's going.
I'm just finding this really, really, really funny. I mean, they're worried about _zoning_ affecting property values in _Arizona_?!
ETA: This is a bit more recent, but mostly just exposes how 207 was really written to fight anti-sprawl legislation, but leave other kinds of land use regulation intact. Which is a little odd. On the one hand, apparently some takings are okay, but others are not? On the other hand, tactically wise to take a bunch of people who are otherwise going to be quite furious (and have the capability to override you) out of the game.