walkitout (walkitout) wrote,
walkitout
walkitout

cnet provides the filing

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10198185-93.html

Embedded is a link to a .pdf:

http://corporate.discovery.com/media/uploads/pdf/discovery-communications-complaint.pdf

I'm reading. . .

ETA:

Okay, _that_ was short. It's three pages mostly establishing jurisdiction, naming kindle and kindle 2 as infringing on the named patent, saying it was willful, asking for triple damages, court costs, etc. and anything else the court is willing to turn over.

I don't know how this stuff works, but this seems like a trial (er) balloon to me. I'm no longer impressed by the lawyers involved.

ETAYA:

Okay, my ignorance is showing once again. I'm still awaiting confirmation from one of my lawyer relatives, however surfing patent infringement filings on Justia suggests that _all_ infringement suits start _exactly_ this way. Back to being impressed that Discovery hired the big guns.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments