walkitout (walkitout) wrote,

ooops kid waking up -- prior art?


How the hell is this not prior art?

ETA: Wondering whether this qualifies as prior art?


Information qualifies -- it doesn't have to have been implemented, the way a patent application has to have at least a demonstration implementation. Patents are given for _nonobvious_ innovation. It's not like the RocketBook -- and reviews thereof that describe things like selling newspapers on them -- were somehow trade secret protected. And the date on the review is earlier than the date on the patent application.

The RocketBook included encryption/decryption, stuff potentially sold online through Amazon.com, downloaded to a home system then loaded onto the reader -- which sounds a lot like what the patent covers, the only exception being that the patent covers a business process for owning the whole stream (operations center + home system).
  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.