But most obnoxious of all is that Izzy takes one brief look at this 3rd trimester baby (so, honestly? Not a miscarriage at all, since this happened after week 20, as near as I can tell -- this is a stillbirth, not a miscarriage) and concludes (a) it is caucasian and (b) therefore Richie -- who is black -- cannot possibly have been the father. If, in the event, it turns out that Izzy is just being a stupid idiot, okay. But one of the black women I grew up knowing had quite mixed heritage. She was married to a (very) white man, and their children varied from about the mother's shade of brown, to porcelain white. At least one of the kids had blue eyes and blonde hair. Now, to be fair, the hospital tried to take that baby away from her, claiming there must have been a mixup (just really makes you want to hurt someone, doesn't it?), so Izzy would be in awesome company in jumping to conclusions about parentage.
But there's no reason why Richie couldn't have had a blonde haired blue eyed parent (grandparent -- whatever), whose genes didn't necessarily show up obviously in Richie, but did reappear in Richie's offspring.
I'm really hoping Izzy is just being set up as an idiot. I really do. Because I hate to see this kind of misunderstanding perpetuated.
I will confess to having a horse in this particular race. I am consistently maddened by people who looked at T. and now look at A. and go, "What color are the baby's eyes?" Well, DUH! They're blue. If they weren't blue (or, I suppose green, or something even weirder, like one blue and one green, or whatever), we'd have a really, really big problem on our hands -- and no one with any sense would be drawing additional attention to it. Because my eyes are blue, and R.'s eyes are blue, and I haven't had sex with anyone else in years. Nevertheless, people will follow up on my statement to this effect by saying really dumbfuck stuff like, "Well, my eyes are brown and my spouse's eyes are brown and we have a blue-eyed kid." Words really fail. One does not necessarily want to just come out and say, just how ignorant _are_ you? Or, they'll say something like, "Well, I had a blue-eyed kid whose eyes changed later." It's particularly disturbing when the person making these remarks is someone employed in health care.
It's not like this kind of recessive-dominant thing is a recent revelation. It's not like you even have to believe in evolution to recognize the truth of it (look who figured it out, after all).