walkitout (walkitout) wrote,

Joint Regulation: that's gotta be a pun, right?


I realize that from Stateside, the Netherlands has appeared to be a haven of legal weed for, basically, ever. But it just isn't that simple. Their policy was really more one of non-enforcement than it was of Yeah, Ok, That's Actually Legal. And AFAIK, it never extended to cultivation, leaving the entire trade in a grey zone that's sort of hard for a country with a huge early input from a bunch of literal text reading theocrats to wrap their brains around (<-- little reference to the whole Puritan thing).

Not too long ago (in fact, recently enough that I think I saw earlier coverage go by), several towns/cities in the Netherlands petitioned the government to either legalize/regulate weed cultivation or allow for local experimentation. The petition was known as the "Joint Regulation". And that is not a translation. Which leads me to believe that it was an intended English-language pun.

Weirdly, it seems that the Netherlands, Washington State and other states in the US will all arrive at a complete regulatory scheme (from cultivation to consumption, with quality control and regulations designed to discourage criminal activities at every step) at more or less the same time.
Tags: our future economy today
  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.